There was an error in this gadget

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Who Is jerking Whom Off?

DAMN! Let me get this as straight as I can: a woman who is constantly in trouble with the Federal Election Commission, who got sued for non-payment by her college, who lied or stretched the truth about her vote outcome in elections, who has a 12 thousand dollar tax lien imposed by the IRS, who is wrought up constantly about gay folks, and who equates masturbation to lust just got elected in a primary as Delaware’s republican candidate for a senate seat? Did that really happen or has someone sneaked some real good weed into my real cheap cigars? Look, we are in serious trouble with about 15 percent real unemployment, schools are broke, states are broke, I am broke, you are broke, but a candidate who has more to say about jerking-off and gay boys and girls than about jobs and the future of Delaware and the country just got put up by republicans to represent them in a national seat? This O’Donnell broad got some support from Sarah Palin, another broad, from the NRA, (I guess the nominee carries a Uzi or wants to send kids to school with one), and from the Tea Party Express which I have to assume is smoking tea not drinking it. Come on now ain’t the Tea party the ones frothing about Charlie Rangel not paying his taxes and the republicans the ones yipping about Geithner not filing his taxes. Or did I miss something? Please tell me I am missing something. Please.

See, I have forever been a reasonable sort of guy, well fairly reasonable, until folks who should know better try to trot some hypocritical horse manure by me. This has plagued me all my life: my inability not to get nakedly- absolutely-squirrel-factory pissed-off with hypocrites, especially hypocrites who feigned intelligence but were really playing with the same deck of trivia cards with which I play. Understanding republicans and Tea Partiers is much like figuring out Daffy Duck or Gearloose Gander, if you get my drift. Gosh, I do try soooo hard to open my mind to stuff like this O’Donnell stuff, but I just can’t. I never know what republicans want except toupees, golf junkets, and no taxes. I have no clue about TPERS- I think they want to get rid of Hitler, carry guns to dinner, follow the Constitution, pay no taxes, and dress up like Revolutionary War re-enacters, or something. Oh yeah, and they sure ain’t got much Christian love for them queers. Most of what I get out of O’Donnell, in more or less her own words, is that she don’t want her bo’friend whacking his wiener because that sort of leaves her out of the love picture, and all.

Why don’t these guys remain constant to a complaint- if Chuck Rangel is a bum for not ponying up his tax dollars how can they vote for a woman who didn’t pay 12 grand in taxes in 2005? If they didn’t like Al Gore for claiming he invented the internet (damn that was stupid wasn’t it?) how can they get in line to vote in a woman who claims she attended Princeton but didn’t or got votes in counties that she didn’t? And whose business is it anyway what you and I do in our own home? Come on ain’t fair, fair? Well, it is a political maxim- invented by the Bushes or maybe by those birds who started all that stuff about Ronnie Reagan being the coolest, smartest, most fiscally sound president, ever- that if you lie often enough, convincingly enough, enough people will believe to spread the word enough to make a truth (that’s a axiom, maybe). If Christine O’Donnell had some solutions about how to get more jobs out there, to find away to get folks back the savings they lost to Wall Street’s gambling, to recover tax dollars wasted in one war we didn’t belong in and in another we were late getting too, to harness in the greed of the insurance, medical, and political mobs, I would be the first in line to vote for her in November. But that ain’t going to happen; she is NOT going to have ONE original or solid idea. But she will scare the quadruple-bejayzuses out of me. When she makes to the senate, look out for a jerk-off tax or for a vibrator ban. And with all the stress going around these days, those would not be good things for ‘Merica.

Monday, September 13, 2010

Will You Just Fwqacking Quit Already?

I have not hit the keyboard in a while and confess a general dismay, depression, and despicability about the nastiness of politics in the country. I know I am naive, but back when the Lone Range, the Cisco Kid (a Latino much admired-wonder which Republican, in order to stir up some snaggle-toothed, mouth breathing drooling votes, would label him and Pancho illegal socio-communo-Nazis?), Roy and Dale Rogers were whipping the hell out of the bad guys, politics did not seem so nasty. I am sure it was nasty, but certainly it wasn’t as publically nasty. Here are a couple of examples of folks who just ought to shut the hell up because they are just plain nasty for sundry reasons.

John Book, Reverend of Christian Viewpoint: darn I used to like the good preacher; however, this Sunday morning while I was deliberating no golf or wet golf, I stumbled across his program. He started by looking in the camera and saying that he wasn't using a teleprompter which would exclude him from being president. Then, he read from a prepared document. Duh, a teleprompter is used to read documents from, is used by all sorts of television types including TV ministers; I don't see the difference between reading from a teleprompter or from paper except if Book had used a prompter, I might not have got such a good view of his gnarly-assed ear hairs. Then this righteous, Christian man continues to read about somebody who was born of a foreign father, whose mother died early, who worked with the poor to better their situation (the entire time he encouraged me "to think now" about whom he was reading) on and on, about 5 pages worth sounding very much like the document had been lifted from President Obama's bio. But oh no! It was Hitler's bio; I guess. At least Rev. Book claimed it was. What a sick puppy this dude is; anyone who suggests that Obama is a Hitler is plainly a whack-job. Only the Christ of turn the other cheek and love one and other would have room in his heart for such a psuedo-Christian. This phony preacher may have a bit of an audience but not me, no more; you got to do better than Rev, Book's quackery to bring me into religion. Shameless performance, shameful man, biblical references not withstanding.

Newt Gingrich: oh well, what this sloppy-jawed, pseudo-intellectual offers any reasonable American is way beyond me. Of course, if you like sound bites, misquotes, racist remarks, outright lies and biscuit-eatin’ republicanism, go ahead and pay attention to this moron. And consider this: his jowl-line is similar to Haley Barbour’s because they have been chomping at the trough of republican hatred and misinformation for their entire lives. And who in the hell names a male kid Newt or Haley for goodness sake? Check out Gingrich’s recent statement about “neo-Kenyan” something or another in an attempt to postulate an idea about Barrack Obama. Break down the comments or writings and then send me a note about how it makes sense, logically or rhetorically. What has this man got (except a shady background) that anyone in his/her normal mind would want part of? What a NEWT this republican lizard is and a philophunculist for sure.

Christine O’Donnell: Now, my home state (for the moment) has another whack job running for office. Of course, she’s been anointed by the lethological, half-governor of Alaska S. Palin’s and that has the Tea Party cranks all lathered up, and they will line up eternally to touch the hem of anyone anointed by the Alaskan ultracrepidarian. Take note though: those of you inclined toward republicanism or Tea Partyism, the IRS filed a tax lien against her for over 11 thousand dollars of unpaid taxes in 2005. (Hmmmmm my back taxes and penalties for 2008 were 790 dollars; maybe I don’t make enough money to run for office.) She claims her financial troubles make her more understanding? Please don’t forget that you folks on the right of good sense were all over Geithner and Rangel for not doing theirs (as you well should be) so for once don’t be hypocrites and ignore her abuses. And according to the News Journal, “The FEC has cited her eight times for failure to report her contributions between 2007 and 2009.” And for all of you, who want to be conservatives, know that her campaign is in debt and she had a time getting her degree from Farleigh Dickinson because of unpaid fees. Go figure. Seems like she will fit right in and catch a bunch of votes: she’s a looker, she has support from the NRA; she hasn’t paid her taxes; she’s sued her employer for gender discrimination. Wow, that’s a resume which Tea Party folks should get behind, right after the get in front of an asphalt layer.

One final rant: the Bush tax cuts which were supposed to increase federal revenues by trickling down to more jobs DIDN’T. So quit all the squealing about how increasing taxes on folks making millions will cost jobs. We got no jobs from 10 years of tax cuts. We did get 1.4 trillion in deficit from the very people who are now complaining about tax and spend democrats. Here’s a question for you fools who still want that old-time-republicanism to return: WHY? More later on ventripotent republicans. Last question; say you elect all republicans and or tea party-types for office- where and how will jobs be created with them in office? What’s their answer?

Got to admit that I did enjoy ferreting out some nifty words for you to look up after perusing the meanderings of this gongoozler.

Quotation of the Day

This Day in History